GENERAL
For
a number of reasons,
non-resident investors
have been a major
factor in many facets
of the Canadian
real estate marketplace
for many years.
Like
most major countries,
Canada taxes
non-residents on
income earned from
the rental of real
estate within its
borders, as well
as on gains realized
on the sale of such
real estate. In
general, Canada's tax treaties allow it unrestricted right to tax such income in the
hands of non-residents.
RENTAL
INCOME
The
Canadian taxation
of real estate rental
income earned by
a non-resident will
vary depending on
whether or not the
rental activities
are considered to
be a business. In
the case of rental
income earned by
an individual (which
will include a natural
person as well as
a trust or estate)
rental activities
will not normally
be considered to
constitute a business unless services are provided that go beyond those
normally associated
with a rental activity.
On that basis, the
ownership and operation
of an apartment
building by a non-resident
individual will
not normally be
considered a business;
whereas the ownership
and operation of
a hotel will.
In
the case of a corporation,
there is a general
presumption in Canadian
tax law that all
activities of a
corporation constitute
a business. In the
case of rental activities,
an exception might
be the rental of
real estate to a
single tenant under
a “net/net” lease.
Under
the assumption that
the rental activities
do not constitute
a business, a non-resident
in receipt of rental
income derived from
real property situated
in Canada will
have the option
of paying Canadian
tax under two methods:
- The
gross rents method,
or
- The
net income method
This
choice must be made
from year to year,
and there is no
prohibition on switching
the method used
from one year to
another.
Gross
Rents Method
Under
this method, the
tax paid (under
Part XIII of the
Income Tax Act-“the
Act”) is equal to
25% of the gross
rents. For this
purpose, based upon
a famous Supreme
Court of Canada
decision in 1968,
it would appear
that gross rents
must include property
taxes paid directly
by the tenant to
the municipality.
This
25% rate is not
reduced under the
latest versions
of any of Canada's tax treaties.
No
Canadian tax return
need be filed under
this method, and
tax should be withheld
and remitted by
the tenant or agent.
It
should be understood
that, in the absence
of a timely filing
of a Canadian tax
return under section
216 of the Act (as
discussed below)
the non-resident
would be required
to pay tax using
the gross rents
method. This will
be the case even
if there is no net
income after expenses
are deducted.
Net
Income Method (Section
216)
In
lieu of paying Canadian
tax on gross rents
under Part XIII,
a non-resident may
elect, instead,
to pay tax under
Part I of the Act,
on the net income.
In the case of natural
persons and estates,
tax will be calculated
using graduated
tax rates similar
to those that apply
to Canadian residents.
Provincial income
taxes will generally
not be payable for
such individual;
however, in lieu
thereof a special
federal surtax will
apply. The end result,
based on 2004 rates,
is that a combined
tax rate of 23.68%
will apply to income
up to $35,000. However,
the rate increases
to a point where
the marginal tax
rate is 42.92% on
income over $113.804.
In
the case of corporations,
federal taxes at
a rate of 32.12%
will apply regardless
of the level of
taxable income.
In
the case of corporations
earning non-business
rental income in
Ontario, Ontario
corporation income
taxes (at a rate
of 14%) will also
apply to the net
income (regardless
of which of the
two methods are
used for federal
purposes). Notwithstanding
that fact, the 10%
“provincial abatement”
normally provided
by the federal government
will not apply.
As
a general rule,
a Canadian tax return
must be filed within
2 years from the
end of the relevant
year to use this
method.
However,
if a form NR6 (undertaking
to file a Canadian
tax return) is filed
in order to reduce
tax withheld at
source,
the return must
be filed within
6 months from the
end of the relevant
year to use this
method.
Rental
losses may not be
carried over to
other years on a
section 216 return.
Rental
Activities That
Constitute a Business
In
cases where the
rental activities
constitute a business
carried on in Canada, the non-resident will be required to pay tax on the net income derived
from such activities
under Part I of
the Act. The gross
rents method will
not be available.
In
such situations,
there is no requirement
for withholding
tax to be remitted
to the taxation
authorities.
In
the case of non-resident
individuals, provincial
income taxes will
be payable instead
of the federal surtax
that normally applies
where a return is
filed under section
216 of the Act.
Corporate
taxes at a federal
rate of 22.12% will
apply where the
non-resident is
a corporation. In
addition, corporation
taxes will be payable
to the province
in which the real
estate is located-in
Ontario the rate
is 14%. Furthermore,
“branch profits
tax” under Part
XIV of the Act will
also apply. In general
terms, this tax
is equal to 25%
of the profits earned
each year after
deducting normal
federal and provincial
income taxes as
well as an “investment
allowance” relating
to the cost of assets
remaining in the
business in Canada.
If the corporation
is resident in a
country with which
Canada has
a tax treaty, the
25% rate will usually
be reduced (to as
low as 5%) and some
exemption may be
available.
Furthermore,
in situations where
the rental activities
constitute a business,
resulting losses
may generally be
carried back for
up to 3 years and
forward for up to
7 years (to be increased
to 10 under proposed
amendments).
GAINS
FROM SALE
Canada taxes non-residents on taxable capital gains arising from the sale
(or other “disposition”)
of “taxable Canadian
property” (“TCP”).
Since
interests in real
estate situated
in Canada are
included in the
TCP definition,
non-residents who
realize taxable
capital gains from
the disposition
of real estate will
be subject to Canadian
tax.
In
general terms, the
amount of the “taxable
capital gain” is
equal to 50% of
the amount by which
the “proceeds of
disposition” (e.g.
sale price) exceeds
the total of the
“adjusted cost base”
of the property
plus costs entailed
in making the disposition
(e.g. real estate
commissions).
The
resulting taxable
capital gain is
included in computing
income and subject
to tax at the relevant
tax rate. Since
only 50% of capital
gains are included
in income, the effective
tax rate is generally
half the normal
rate on income.
In
certain cases, a
gain from the sale
of real estate may
be fully taxable
business income,
rather than a capital
gain. This will
be the case, for
example, where the
taxpayer is engaged
in a business of
developing real
estate for sale.
It will also be
the case even if
the real estate
was acquired as
part of an isolated
speculative transaction
in order to resell
it at a profit (an
“adventure or concern
in the nature of
trade”).
In
cases where a portion
of the sale price
is not yet due at
the end of the year
of sale, Canadian
tax law normally
allows a “reserve”
to be claimed under
which the recognition
of an appropriate
portion of the taxable
capital gains is
deferred. However,
the claiming of
such a reserve is
not permitted where
the taxpayer in
question is a non-resident.
None
of Canada's
tax treaties preclude
it from levying
tax on gains from
the disposition
of Canadian real
estate. However,
Canada's
treaties with the
United
States
and the Netherlands contain “fresh start” rules under which gains accrued prior to certain
dates in the 1980s
will be exempt from
Canadian tax.
INDIRECT
INTERESTS
In
certain cases, indirect
interests in Canadian
real estate (i.e.
interests held through
corporations, partnerships,
or trusts) may also
constitute TCP.
As such, capital
gains realized by
non-residents on
the disposition
of their interests
in such entities
will be subject
to Canadian tax
under the Act.
For
example, shares
in corporations
resident in Canada will
always be TCP unless
they are listed
on a prescribed
stock exchange.
Even shares of non-resident
corporations will
be TCP if most of
the underlying value
is attributable
to Canadian real
estate.
However,
under the provisions
of many of Canadian
tax treaties, Canada will be precluded from taxing gains realized by residents of the relevant
jurisdiction on
certain types of
TCP. For example,
under Canada's
tax treaty with
the United
States,
Canada would
generally be precluded
from taxing U.S. residents
on capital gains
from the disposition
of shares of corporations
not resident in
Canada, even if most of the value of such shares is attributable to underlying
Canadian real estate.
In addition, in
certain cases (e.g.
Canada's
tax treaty with
Barbados) gains from the disposition of shares in real estate holding corporation
may only be taxed
if the Canadian
real estate is directly
held by that corporation-if
it is held by a
subsidiary of that
corporation, Canada may
not tax the gain.
In addition, under
certain treaties
(e.g. Canada's tax
treaty with the
United Kingdom),
Canada may not tax
gains from the disposition
of shares in corporation
if the underlying
value is mainly
attributable to
real estate used
in a business (other
than a rental business)
of that corporation.
TAX
CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS
AND WITHHOLDING
In
the absence of obtaining
a tax clearance
from the Canada
Revenue Agency,
a person acquiring
TCP from a non-resident
is obliged to remit
amounts on account
of that non-resident's
tax. In certain
cases, an additional
requirement will
apply in connection
with Quebec taxation authorities
where the property
is real estate situated
in the Province of Quebec.
As
a general rule,
the amount of tax
that must be remitted
in the absence of
a tax clearance
is 25% of the purchase
price. However,
where the property
is “depreciable
property” (e.g.
the building component
of the real estate)
or real estate inventory,
the rate is 50%.
In
order to obtain
a clearance, the
vendor must pay
or post security
for 25% of the amount
by which the sale
price exceeds the
adjusted cost base
of the property.
Furthermore, where
“capital cost allowance”
(i.e. the Canadian
tax equivalent of
depreciation) has
been claimed additional
amounts may be required.
Normally, the amount
paid or posted exceeds
the actual tax liability
that will be calculated
when the tax return
is filed. This is
because of the fact
that the rate of
tax generally exceeds
the actual effective
tax rate, as well
as the fact that
“costs of disposition”
(e.g. sales commissions)
may not be deducted
in computing the
amount required
to obtain the clearance,
whereas they are
allowed in computing
the capital gain
when the return
is filed.
DEEMED
DISPOSITION ON DEATH
In
cases where a non-resident
holds an interest
in Canadian real
estate (or other
TCP) at the time
of his or her death,
he or she will be
deemed to have disposed
of such TCP immediately
before that time
for proceeds of
disposition equal
to the fair market
value of such property.
Unlike
the situation where
a Canadian resident
dies, there will
generally be no
“spousal rollover”
(i.e. deferral of
capital gains where
property passes
to a spouse) allowed
on the death of
a non-resident.
However, if the
non-resident is
a U.S. resident,
the spousal rollover
may be available
as a result of a
special provision
found in the Canada-U.S.
Tax Convention.
In
certain cases, proper
planning may avoid
exposure to the
Canadian taxation
of capital gains
on death. For example,
if the non-resident
holds his or her
interest by means
of an entity that
is not TCP (e.g.
a
partnership in which
interests in TCP
represent
a minority of the
value of its assets)
Canadian tax liability
may be avoided.
Other strategies
might depend on
the application
of the tax treaty
between Canada and
the non-resident's
country of residence
to the nature of
the entity through
which the real estate
is held.
|