Hong
Kong Banking
Hong
Kong has one of the largest representation
of international banks in the world: 71
of the world's 100 largest banks have
a presence there. Hong Kong is the world's
9th largest international banking centre
in terms of the volume of external transactions,
and the second largest in Asia after Japan.
The banking sector plays a vital role
in establishing Hong Kong as a major loan
syndication centre in the region.
The
banking sector, being the major participant
of the Hong Kong foreign exchange market,
contributes to Hong Hong's status as the
world's 7th largest foreign exchange centre.
At
the end of September 2011, there were
151 licensed banks (128 of which were
incorporated outside Hong Kong), 19 restricted
licence banks (of which seven were incorporated
outside Hong Kong) and 26 deposit-taking
companies in business (all incorporated
in Hong Kong). These 196 authorised institutions
operate a comprehensive network of 1,300
local branches. In addition, there were
65 local representative offices of overseas
banks in Hong Kong.
Total
Employment in the sector is about 80,000.
Banking assets amount to more than US$1
trillion.
The
banking system in Hong Kong is characterized
by its 3-tier system, which is formed
by 3 types of banking institutions, namely
licensed banks, restricted licensed banks
and deposit-taking companies, which are
authorised to take deposits from the general
public. The 3-tier of deposit-taking institutions
operate under different restrictions.
Only licensed banks and restricted licensed
banks can be called banks.
Hong
Kong's banking sector is highly open,
being the second largest international
banking centre in Asia after Japan in
terms of the volume of external transactions.
The
success of the SAR's banking and financial
services economy is largely a consequence
of a non-discriminatory low tax regime.
Business profits are taxed at a maximum
rate of 16.5% whereas employees pay a
maximum tax on salaries of 15%. Low tax
rates are complemented by the absence
of a number of types of taxation. Thus
(save in very limited circumstances) there
are no withholding taxes, no taxes on
interest, no capital gains taxes, no sales
tax or VAT; and income arising outside
the jurisdiction is not taxable in Hong
Kong under the "territorial principle".
Deductible allowances are equally generous.
China
A
major liberalization measure went into
effect in January 2011 under the Closer
Economic Parntership Arrangement (CEPA)
between Hong Kong and China.
Under
CEPA VII, which took effect on January
1, 2011, is that a Hong Kong bank that
has maintained a representative office
in China for more than one year can now
apply to set up a wholly foreign-funded
bank or a foreign bank branch. A Hong
Kong bank's operating institution in China
can apply to conduct renminbi business,
if it has been operating for more than
two years and has been profitable for
one year prior to the application.
Additionally,
the asset requirement for Hong Kong banks
to establish on the mainland is being
reduced to HKD6 billion (from HKD10 billion),
making it easier for many of the SAR’s
banks to set up in China.
During
the last few years the Chinese authorities
have been racing to clean up major domestic
banks, which were weighed down with bad
debts and clunky administration.
The
liberalization of China's banking market
has been a slow process, and by December,
2006, only eight foreign banks had applied
for retail banking licenses in mainland
China, as the country opened its banking
market under WTO rules it agreed five
years previously.
By
June 2011, there were 127 foreign banks
in China, but until recently most of them
were limited to handling foreign currency
business. In 2010 foreign banks accounted
for just 1.83% of the country's total
banking assets, or RMB1.7 trillion, up
from 1.7% in 2009. Locally-incorporated
foreign banks now total 40, and data from
the China Banking Regulatory Commission
shows that they accounted for 87% of all
foreign banking assets at the end of 2010.
Nonetheless,
foreign banks operating in China are "surprisingly
confident" about their prospects
in the Chinese market according to a 2011
report by PwC, entitled 'Foreign Banks
in China', which found that most foreign
banks expect revenues to grow over the
next three years as the Chinese economy
opens up to foreign investment and the
central government takes steps to liberalize
the renminbi.
In
addition to organic growth, PwC's report
concludes that foreign banks are pursuing
strategic partnerships and making acquisitions
where possible in many different parts
of the financial sector.
"Indeed,
it is the inevitability of this gradual
defined process towards greater internationalisation
of the economy that is underpinning the
foreign banks' optimism. They believe
that the opening up of the economy and
the transition to a convertible currency
must lead to increased opportunities for
foreign banks," the report states.
However,
the report found that while foreign banks
believe that China offers "rich opportunities",
they will only be able to exploit these
opportunities if the playing field is
level and China's regulators continue
along their liberalising path.
The
report identified a select group of six
six banks which are said to be ahead of
the competition in terms of customer base
and branch networks. These banks include
Hong
Kong's Bank of East Asia, Hang Seng Bank,
Citibank, DBS Banks, HSBC and Standard
Chartered. This group estimates that they
will collectively operate a network of
500 branches and sub-branches by 2014.
A second group of corporate and investment
banks has also emerged, according to PwC,
which includes some major European and
American institutions. The report additionally
observed the emergence of a third group
of mainly Asian banks with close trading
and business links with China, and a fourth
group of banks of various sizes from around
the world that are focussing on niche
markets such as wealth management, trade
financing and foreign exchange.
The
42 banks interviewed for the report expect
to grow employment by more than 50% by
2014, to over 52,000 people.
A
Memorandum of Understanding was signed
in August 2003 by the Hong Kong Monetary
Authority (HKMA) and the China Banking
Regulatory Commission (CBRC) to strengthen
supervision of banks operating on both
sides of the border. HKMA operates in
effect as Hong Kong's Central Bank, while
the CBRC was formed earlier in the year
to take over banking supervisory responsibility
from the People's Bank of China. The 15-department
CBRC says its major responsibilities include
"formulating supervisory rules and regulations
for banking institutions, (and) authorizing
the establishment, changes, termination,
branching out and business scope of banking
institutions.'' It is also responsible
for dealing with problem deposit-taking
institutions. The MoU calls for the two
regulators to share supervisory information
for banks operating in China and Hong
Kong and they will work together to ensure
that a parent bank exercises "adequate
and effective" control over the operations
of cross-border branches and subsidiaries.
They will also meet formally twice a year.
Liberalization
of the Yuan
2003-2006
In
September, 2003, China's central bank
chief Zhou Xioachuan was in Hong Hong
to discuss the possibility of the territory's
financial institutions formally accepting
yuan deposits. In November that year,
it was announced that banks in Hong Kong
would soon be permitted to offer certain
renminbi-denominated services, as part
of the ongoing initiative to deepen economic
ties between the territory and the Chinese
mainland. Banks will be allowed to accept
deposits, arrange remittances, issue credit
and debit cards, and make foreign exchange
transactions. However, they were not,
initially at least, able to offer corporate
banking services.
Although recent estimates have suggested
that there is between RMB20 billion and
RMB70 billion circulating in Hong Kong,
the jurisdiction's banks have traditionally
been unable to access the cash due to
foreign exchange restrictions and capital
controls imposed by the mainland authorities.
Hong Kong's then chief executive, Tung
Chee-hwa welcomed the move, hailing it
as a "very important step to consolidate
our position as an international financial
centre".
Analysts
also considered this an important first
step towards Hong Kong becoming an offshore
yuan trading centre. "The integration
between the two places will be closer
and closer, so that means that renminbi
will co-circulate with the Hong Kong dollar
in Hong Kong going forward," said
Chris Leung, senior economist at DBS Bank,
"Obviously, if that's the case, there's
sort of a demand for renminbi storage
with the banks. So it's a natural development,
but the problem is there are many technicalities
and contradictions in order for this to
become a reality," Leung added.
In
February 2004, the eagerly anticipated
move to liberalise trading and exchange
of the yuan in Hong Kong took its first
step forward after the city’s banks were
given the go-ahead to begin taking deposits
in the Chinese currency.
With billions of dollars worth of yuan
notes floating around in the city, Hong
Kong banks are using a variety of incentives
to potential customers in a bid to suck
in some of this (previously illegal) surplus
cash. They will be helped by the fact
that interest rates on yuan deposits will
be higher than those on the HK dollar,
reflecting the rate of interest on the
mainland.
Under the relaxed rules, banks were able
to exchange up to 20,000 yuan a day ($2,400)
per individual provided the transaction
is conducted through a deposit account.
Meanwhile, cash transactions were limited
to 6,000 yuan, and individuals may remit
up to 50,000 yuan per day back to their
accounts in China.
However, the changes far from represented
a fully liberalised exchange system, and
tight restrictions remained on the Chinese
currency in the city. For instance, the
new rules will only allow Hong Kong residents
and those with a Hong Kong ID card to
make yuan bank deposits, whilst companies
will remain barred from banking the currency.
In
April, 2004, the Bank of China Hong Kong
announced that it would begin issuing
credit cards and bank cards for use with
the yuan. The yuan-based credit and ATM
cards were the first to be issued in the
city since restrictions on the circulation
of the Chinese currency in Hong Kong were
relaxed earlier in the year. Several other
banks were also preparing to launch their
own cards at this time.
BOC Hong Kong, chosen by the Chinese authorities
to act as the central clearing bank for
all yuan services in the SAR, additionally
revealed that the new cards will be connected
to China’s UnionPay payment network, used
by some 400,000 merchants and 50,000 ATMs
on the mainland.
2007-2010
The
first renminbi bond issue by a Mainland
financial institution came in 2007. In
July of that year, the China Development
Bank (CDB) announced that the subscription
result of the first issue of renminbi
bonds in Hong Kong reflected a strong
response from both retail and institutional
investors, with an oversubscription rate
of nearly two times.
To
facilitate the issuance and trading of
renminbi bonds in Hong Kong, the Real
Time Gross Settlement system and Central
Moneymarkets Unit have been upgraded to
handle the related settlements of renminbi
funds and trading of renminbi bonds respectively.
The recently introduced renminbi interbank
transfer service and use of renminbi cheques
in Hong Kong have operated smoothly during
the subscription process, signifying the
enhancement of the capabilities of local
banks in handling renminbi financial transactions.
The
Treasury Market Association has also commenced
work on the arrangements for renminbi
bond price fixing and repo documentation,
which will be conducive to the development
of a secondary market for renminbi bonds
in Hong Kong.
After
Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao announced in
Singapore, in November 2007, that he did
not agree with the cash withdrawal limits
placed on Shenzhen banks, they were hastily
withdrawn, leaving the underground pipeline
that has been sustaining Hong Kong's booming
stockmarket in full flood.
"The
Shenzhen banks' motives are good but they
could employ better methods," said
Wen. "We should have taken measures
that were more effective and that were
acceptable to the public."
The
Chinese authorities are of course fully
aware of the flow of illegitimate cash
to Hong Kong, caused by Chinese exchange
controls, and they are under heavy pressure
to liberalize the renminbi. It was this
that had led to the now-abandoned 'through-train'
proposal to allow investment in Hong Kong
stocks through defined channels.
Shenzhen
banks had set a daily withdrawal limit
of Renminbi 30,000 on personal accounts.
"If the illegal fund flow is not
controlled, it will affect the financial
stability in the country, including Hong
Kong," Wen said, but it's not clear
what action Beijing will now take.
It's
not just the official banks that operate
the pipeline: the local equivalent of
hawali money-exchange networks are involved,
and there are many parallel unofficial
links between individuals. In fact the
border is so porous that it's difficult
to see how some form of liberalization
can be avoided. Local estimates are that
the daily flow of cash between Hong Kong
and Shenzhen amounts to several billion
renminbi.
In
August 2010, the People's Bank of China
(PBoC) announced that eligible institutions
outside the Mainland could take part in
a pilot scheme to make use of their renminbi
(RMB) funds to invest in the Mainland's
interbank bond market. Under the scheme,
banks participating in RMB business in
Hong Kong can conduct trading in the Mainland's
interbank bond market upon approval by
the PBoC. Chief Executive of the HKMA,
Norman Chan, said: "The launch of
the scheme has opened up a channel for
RMB funds and financial institutions in
Hong Kong to invest in the Mainland. This
will further promote the development of
RMB trade settlement in Hong Kong, and
enhance the attractiveness of RMB offshore
business in Hong Kong."
On
November 22, 2010, Sun Xiaoxia, Director-General
of the Finance Department of the Ministry
of Finance (MoF), and Mr Eddie Yue, Deputy
Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Monetary
Authority (HKMA), signed a "Memorandum
of Co-operation on Using Central Moneymarkets
Unit for Issuance of Renminbi Sovereign
Bonds" in Hong Kong, setting the
foundation for the tendering and issue
of renminbi sovereign bonds through the
CMU BID, a bond tendering platform offered
by the Central Moneymarkets Unit (CMU)
operated by the HKMA.
According
to the HKMA, this move "manifests
a deepening of financial co-operation
between the Mainland and Hong Kong, and
will widen the channel and enhance the
methodology and environment for the issuance
of renminbi sovereign bonds."
Chan
of the HKMA, said: "The CMU tendering
platform has served us well in the past
17 years. It is where the primary issues
of the Exchange Fund Bills and Notes and
the Government Bonds are tendered. It
helps increase market transparency and
facilitates price discovery. The signing
of the Memorandum by the MoF and the HKMA
on using the CMU to conduct tendering
for the issuance of the renminbi sovereign
bonds marks a milestone of the strengthening
of financial co-operation between the
Mainland and Hong Kong."
The
CMU is operated by the HKMA. It serves
as a platform for tendering, clearing
and settlement of bonds. The tendering
of renminbi sovereign bonds through the
CMU is the system’s first tendering
of bonds denominated in renminbi.
That
same day,
the Ministry of Finance of the People’s
Republic of China announced that a tender
of three-year, five-year and ten-year
RMB Bonds of the Central People’s
Government would be held on November 30,
2010 for settlement on December 1, 2010.
A
total of RMB2bn three-year Bonds, RMB2bn
five-year Bonds and RMB1bn ten-year Bonds
were to be made available for competitive
tender on a coupon-bid basis by any qualified
Central Moneymarkets Unit members through
the CMU BID, a bond tendering platform.
The
Bonds were to be issued at par value and
will mature in 2013, 2015 and 2020 respectively,
on the last interest payment date of the
relevant series of Bonds. Each series
of Bonds will bear interest at the uniform
annual issue interest rate for the relevant
series determined through the competitive
tender (i.e. the highest accepted interest
rate for the relevant series), payable
semi-annually in arrears. Each tender
must be for an amount of RMB500,000 or
integral multiples thereof and the difference
between any specified tender interest
rates should be at least 0.01%, rounded
to two decimal places.
2011
The State Administration
of Foreign Exchange (SAFE), in a short
statement, has confirmed that it will
look for a developing use of China's currency,
the yuan, in capital account transactions
this year.
While it will
continue its close monitoring of capital
account flows, it is now to be expected
that convertibility of the yuan for cross-border
investment purposes will mirror the use
of the yuan for cross-border trade settlement,
which is already much further developed.
It was reported that it is also proposed
to extend the trial of yuan-denominated
cross-border trade settlement to all cities
in China by the end of this year. The
central bank has said that such settlement
reached a total of more than CHY506bn
(USD77bn) in 2010. In addition, by the
end of the year, more than 67,000 Chinese
companies had joined the yuan settlement
programme.
Hong Kong has
previously confirmed its involvement in
the development of the yuan’s capital
market utilization being contemplated
by SAFE. Cross-border yuan trade settlement
handled in Hong Kong reached CHY370bn
last year, and Hong Kong has also seen
progress in other yuan-denominated areas,
including deposits, bond issuance and
the introduction of financial products.
Hong Kong maintains
close contact with SAFE to further develop
Hong Kong’s yuan bond market. As
at end-January this year, there were a
total of 31 yuan bond issues with an issuance
size of about CHY74.4bn. The range of
issuers has expanded from Mainland financial
institutions to multinational non-financial
institutions.
Anti-Money
Laundering
Alongside
liberalisation of the yuan market, the
Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has
urged banks in the jurisdiction to be
alert to the possibility of money laundering
as they gear up to offer yuan-denominated
banking services. "Participating banks
are requested to heighten the awareness
of their staff involved in such business
to possible money laundering transactions,"
the regulator announced. In order to reduce
the possibility of money laundering activity
taking place, the HKMA ordered banks to
record whether yuan deposits are made
in cash, or via the conversion of other
currencies.
It
also urged the financial institutions
to keep track of multiple accounts opened
by the same customer, and to ensure that
the 20,000 yuan per day exchange limit
is not breached by spreading the transactions
across several accounts.
On
this front, the Hong Kong Securities and
Futures Commission (SFC) entered into
a MoU with the CBRC for co-operation and
information sharing with respect to Hong
Kong licensed intermediaries who provide
services to Mainland commercial banks
conducting overseas wealth management
business on behalf of their clients
The
MoU was signed on April 10, 2007, in Hong
Kong by Eddy Fong, Chairman of the SFC
and Liu Mingkang, Chairman of the CBRC
and took immediate effect.
“The
MoU is conducive to further enhancement
of the regulatory co-operation framework.
It provides a solid foundation for the
commencement of effective regulatory co-operation,"
stated Liu. "Through mutual assistance
and information sharing, we can promptly
identify risks, and take timely regulatory
measures to protect the interests of investors.”
The
Hong Kong Security Bureau has said that
from January 26, 2007, remittance agents
and money changers must verify customers'
identities, and record transactions of
HKD8,000 (about USD1,000) or more. They
must also verify the identity of anyone
who receives a remittance of HKD8,000
or more.
The
requirements aim to meet the new international
standards with regard to combating money
laundering and terrorist financing.
Customers
must produce their Hong Kong identity
cards - or certificate of identity, document
of identity or travel document - for verification,
and provide their addresses and telephone
numbers.
Agents
and money changers must also record and
retain the particulars of the sender and
the instructor of any transaction if the
two are not the same person.
Accounting
Standards
Two
new accounting standards came into force
in Hong Kong in January 2005. At more
than 320 pages with an additional 214
pages of implementation guidance, Hong
Kong Accounting Standards 32 and 39 are
detailed and prescriptive in nature.
The
new accounting standards require banks
to estimate loan provisions based on future
cash flows rather than the previous guidelines
issued by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority,
and review the basis for general provisioning.
Most banks hold a general provision of
around 1% of total advances, as required
by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. The
new standard requires this to be based
on an analysis of historical loss experience
and may lead to a significant write back
of general provisions. The standards are
the Hong Kong Society of Accountants'
final step in achieving full convergence
with International Financial Reporting
Standards. In achieving full compliance
Hong Kong banks will be more comparable
with their international peers, facilitating
easier access to cross border capital
markets.
Deposit
Protection Scheme
Hong
Kong’s enhanced deposit protection
scheme, (DPS) providing a higher protection
limit of HKD500,000 (USD64,300), from
a previous limit of HKD100,000, came into
operation on January 1, 2011.
In addition to the increase in the protection
limit per depositor per bank, the scheme
also now includes deposits pledged as
security for banking services. However,
as restricted-licence banks and deposit-taking
companies are not members of the scheme,
the scheme does not cover deposits placed
with those institutions.
The
Full Deposit Guarantee provided by the
Government was introduced on 14 October
2008, which guarantees all deposits held
with authorized institutions (i.e. all
licensed banks, restricted licence banks
and deposit-taking companies) until the
end of 2010. This special guarantee was
a contingency measure introduced at the
onset of the global financial crisis in
late 2008 to reinforce confidence in Hong
Kong’s banking system.
The Financial Secretary, John Tsang, said
the full deposit guarantee had functioned
effectively to shore up public confidence
in Hong Kong's banking system during the
global financial crisis, but “as
the global economy has become more stable,
the provision of this special guarantee
by the government should come to an end
as originally planned."
The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Monetary
Authority, Mr Norman Chan, said, “Our
banking system remains healthy and robust,
with capitalisation well above international
standards. Public confidence in the banking
system has also remained strong. The expiry
of the Full Deposit Guarantee is not expected
to have any impact on the banking system.”
The
Hong Kong Deposit Protection Board has
undertaken extensive publicity campaigns
since the second half of 2010 to raise
public awareness on the changes, including
their understanding on the coverage under
the enhanced Scheme. Close collaboration
with banks has been maintained to ensure
that they make timely adjustments to their
systems and business flows. Furthermore,
the Board has worked closely with the
HKMA as the banking regulator to remind
Authorized Institutions to make proper
representation on the expiry of the full
deposit guarantee and its potential impact
on their customers.
Mrs Chan Wong Shui, Chairperson of the
Board, said, "The enhanced Deposit
Protection Scheme stands ready to provide
a means of protection to depositors. The
new protection limit of $500,000 will
be able to fully cover about 90% of the
bank depositors. The Board has taken the
necessary measures to prepare for a smooth
transition to the new Scheme."
After the implementation of the enhanced
DPS, the Board will continue to maintain
an effective and efficient DPS in line
with international practice.
Hong
Kong's Deposit Protection Scheme was first
launched on September 25, 2006, with a
coverage limit of $100,000 per depositor
per bank.
Enacted on May 5, 2004, the Deposit Protection
Scheme Ordinance governs the setting up
and operation of the scheme. After two
years of intensive preparation,the scheme
provided deposit protection and and collected
contributions from members from the 25th
of that month.
All
licensed banks, unless otherwise exempted
by the board, are required to participate
as members.
The
main features of the scheme are that:
- Depositors
are not required to apply for protection
or compensation, eligible deposits held
with scheme members will automatically
come under the protection of the scheme;
- Both
Hong Kong dollar and foreign currency
deposits are protected;
- The
scheme protects eligible deposits held
in scheme members, it does notprotect
term deposits with a maturity longer
than five years, structured deposits,
secured deposits, bearer instruments,
off-shore deposits and non-deposit products
such as bonds, stocks, warrants, mutual
funds, unit trusts and insurance policies;
- A
Deposit Protection Scheme Fund with
a target fund size of 0.3% of the total
amount of relevant deposits (translating
into a fund size of approximately $1.3
billion) will be built through the collection
of contributions from scheme members;
and
- Differential
contributions will be assessed based
on the supervisory ratings of individual
scheme members.
Members
are also required to notify their customers
if a financial product described as a
deposit is not protected by the scheme.
Capital
Adequacy Rules
New
Banking (Capital) Rules came into effect
in January, 2007, and are the implementing
Rules for Basel II, the international
standard for banks' capital adequacy.
They
set out in detail the different approaches
that can be adopted for calculating the
capital charge for credit, market and
operational risks.
They
were issued under a new rule-making power
provided under the Banking (Amendment)
Ordinance 2005, and replaced the previous
regulatory capital regime set out in the
third schedule to the Banking Ordinance.
In
September 2010, HKMA deputy chief executive
Arthur Yuen Kwok-hang suggested that Hong
Kong's banks will have few problems complying
with the latest changes to international
capital adequacy rules known as Basel
III. He said that local banks' capital
ratios are already well above existing
standards, with capital adequacy ratios
standing at 15.7% in June 2010.
Under
Basel III banks will have to maintain
capital adequacy ratios at 8%, but tier
1 capital requirement, which includes
common equity and other qualifying financial
instruments based on stricter criteria,
will increase from 4% to 6% from January
1, 2013 to January 1, 2015. Banks will
be required to hold a capital conservation
buffer of 2.5% to withstand future periods
of stress bringing the total common equity
requirements to 7%. The buffer requirement
will be phased in from January 1, 2016
to January 1, 2019.
Banking
Stability Review
The
Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced
in December 2007, a review of its work
in the area of banking stability, and
appointed former Jersey banking regulator,
David Carse as consultant to conduct the
review.
The
aim of the review was to make recommendations
on how the HKMA can best discharge its
functions in promoting the general stability
and effective working of the banking system,
taking into account recent and likely
future developments in Hong Kong’s
banking system, and the changing nature
of the risks facing it.
Carse's
report, which was published in July 2008,
found that the Hong Kong banking system
is in "robust" condition. The
review concluded that the HKMA is widely
respected by the Hong Kong banking sector
for its professionalism and effectiveness,
and viewed by outside commentators as
in the top flight of regulators internationally.
No fundamental deficiencies in the regulatory
and supervisory framework or processes
have been identified. However, the report
recommends a number of measures to provide
an even sounder foundation to cope with
the challenges ahead.
"The
global banking system is now facing a
new crisis triggered by the problems in
the US sub-prime market," the report
stated. "Although the Hong Kong banking
system has so far been relatively unscathed
by this, the HKMA will need to absorb
the various lessons to be learned from
it and this will to some extent determine
its supervisory agenda over the next few
years."
A
more fundamental issue for the HKMA, the
report noted, will be how to manage the
growing integration with the banking system
on the Mainland.
"The
ability to expand into the Mainland will
create new business opportunities for
Hong Kong banks, which are facing increasing
competition in their domestic market,
but will also bring with it increased
risks. The HKMA will need to ensure that
both the banks and itself understand the
nature of these risks and that there are
adequate means in place to control them.
Cooperation with the China Banking Regulatory
Commission will be a vital factor in this,"
the report suggested.
BACK
TO TOP