As a candidate for EU membership from 2000 until 2004 (when
it joined the Union), Cyprus was under the watchful eye of Brussels, and the
government pledged full compliance with the OECD's harmful tax initiative, undertaking
to set up a programme to exchange information on taxation, transparency and
other issues to meet the OECD deadline of 2005. Despite avoiding the OECD's
final list, Cyprus was still given a poor rating on financial supervision. The
government showed its determination to crack down on money laundering and improve
supervision, and made an effort to close down any dubious institutions.
On a visit to the US in March 2001, Cyprus's then Finance Minister Takis Clerides
was faced with a report published in the Washington Post, which implicated Cyprus
in money laundering activities. Mr Clerides presented a series of documents
as evidence of Cyprus's efforts in preventing money laundering in the jurisdiction.
Clerides told the media that the documents were taken from reports by international
organisations such as the Council of Europe, FATF and IMF. All concluded on
a positive note and declared that Cyprus met their international standards against
money laundering and financial crimes.
The report had been prompted by allegations by the governor of the former Yugoslav
Central Bank, Mladjen Dinkic, who claimed that the ex-Yugoslav President Slobodan
Milosevic had used Cyprus as a transit point for money totalling US$4bn. Clerides
argued that the Cyprus Central Bank has consistently denied that it knowingly
played any part in the money laundering and has cooperated fully with the authorities
in the former Yugoslavia in helping them with their investigations into the
illegal siphoning of Yugoslavian funds out of the country.
With regard to accusations that money laundering had taken place through investments
in Russia, Mr Clerides confirmed that Cyprus was one of the top five foreign
countries investing in Russia, but he said that most Cypriot investors in the
country represented foreign and not domestic interests, such as America, Canada
and Western Europe. These investors, he added, used Cyprus to make investments
so they could take advantage of the country's double tax treaty with Russia.
In July 2001, a delegation from the European Union's Peer committee began an
inspection of Cyprus's financial sector to determine if Cyprus had sufficiently
aligned its laws with EU directives governing banking, the stock exchange, offshore
institutions, the insurance industry and co-operative credit institutions.
Then in August of that year, the International Monetary Fund visited Cyprus
to undertake the first in a series of planned reviews of offshore financial
centres (OFCs). Starting with Cyprus, an IMF staff assessment programme, designed
to help strengthen financial supervision of OFCs and to promote greater cooperation
among supervisory authorities, reviewed and analysed the extent to which the
Island's OFC met international banking, securities, and insurance standards,
and to determine if further action was required for those standards to be met.
The IMF's report: 'Cyprus - Assessment of Implementation of the Basel Core
Principles for Effective Banking Supervision in Respect of the Offshore Sector
- July 30, 2001', was an informal review of the supervision of the Cypriot banking
sector which indicated that supervision was 'generally effective and thorough.'
However, the review pointed to a level of supervision that was 'less than desirable'
due to the scarcity of some resources.
In addition the review highlighted the fact that regulators and financial institutions
depended, to a degree, on accounting and legal firms which were not regulated
by any external authorities. 'It is clear that the provision of company services
through limited liability companies owned and managed by accounting and law
firms is not effectively regulated,' it stated.
After the terrorist attacks of 11th September, the government of Cyprus responded
swiftly and angrily to allegations made by the former head of the CIA, James
Woosley, that Cyprus was used by the Saudi dissident Osama Bin Laden to launder
funds later used for terrorist activities.
In December 2001, the government showed its determination to wage war against
terrorism as then President Glafcos Clerides officially signed the International
Convention to Combat the Financing of Terrorism. Cyprus was the 15th country
internationally to ratify the convention.
During the gradual process of adoption of the EU's 'acquis communautaire',
Cyprus fell into line with international standards of anti-money laundering
legislation and financial transparency with little dissension or controversy.
Included among the measures taken in 2002 and 2003 was the adoption of a fiscal
'level-playing field' for companies, with the introduction of a harmonised 10%
tax rate (the lowest in the EU). Offshore companies officially ceased to exist
in Cyprus as a result.
When the EU finalised its Savings Tax Directive in 2003 the Cypriot Finance
Ministry confirmed that Cyprus would adopt the package in full by 2005.
Many observers believed that the directive would not have a significant impact
on the island, given that a large proportion of money held in bank deposits
comes from non-EU sources. Also, the legislation does not apply to companies,
allowing much of the Cypriot offshore business sector to remain relatively unaffected.
It was the banking sector which provided the only substantial ripple in the
run-up to EU accession, and the Government ran into a storm of opposition when
it proposed late in 2003 to lessen banking confidentiality in an attempt to
reduce tax evasion.
Cypriot Finance Minister at the time, Marcos Kyprianou defended the government’s
decision to partially lift banking confidentiality after critics argued that
the measures were too severe. George Hadjianastasiou, chief of the Commercial
Bankers Association, said that the government’s policy was too heavy-handed
and warned that capital will eventually flee the island as a result.
However, addressing the House Finance Committee, Kyprianou criticised the banks
for being uncooperative towards the Inland Revenue when the latter requested
information on accounts for tax purposes, and assured them that the information
sought by the tax department was being used solely for purposes of investigating
tax evasion. The minister also suggested that a proposed tax amnesty, offering
a reduced 5% tax for those revealing details of undeclared accounts, would be
impossible without at least a partial lifting of bank confidentiality.
“Taking into consideration the need for various exceptions that concern
foreign capital which does not concern us since it is not taxed here, two measures
must be taken: a special arrangement to tax secret accounts and end their existence,
but, to avoid their re-occurrence, there must be access to accounts,”
announced the Finance Minister.
In the early months of 2004 various compromise proposals were discussed, although
in the excitement of EU accession and the failed referendum over the Annan plan
for reunification of the island the issue seemed to be on the back-burner, if
only temporarily.
In March, 2005, the Cyprus Unit for Combating Money Laundering (MOKAS) signed
a Memorandum of Understanding with the US Department of the Treasury Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).
In June 2007, in a measure affecting Cyprus in its role as an EU member, it
was announced that travellers entering or leaving the European Union would have
to declare cash movements of more than EUR10,000, as new customs laws designed
to thwart money laundering and terrorist financing took effect.
Under the new rules customs authorities were empowered to undertake controls
on people and their luggage and detain cash that has not been declared. They
are required to initiate proceedings against people who fail to declare cash
of an amount of EUR10,000 or more. The rules also required the declaration of
the equivalent amount in other currencies or easily convertible assets such
as non crossed cheques.
Returning to tax matters, later that year, in October 2007, the OECD published
a report entitled 'Tax Co-operation: Towards a Level Playing Field – 2007
Assessment by the Global Forum on Taxation', which compared the legal frameworks
for international tax co-operation of 82 OECD and non-OECD economies.
The Organisation observed that:
"Many financial centres, both onshore and offshore, are making progress
in improving transparency and international co-operation to counter offshore
tax evasion, but some still fall short of international standards that have
been developed over the last seven years."
It went on to suggest that significant restrictions on access to bank information
for tax purposes remained in three OECD countries (Austria, Luxembourg and Switzerland)
and in a number of offshore financial centres (e.g Cyprus, Liechtenstein, Panama
and Singapore).
It further argued that a number of offshore financial centres that committed
to implement standards on transparency and the effective exchange of information
standards developed by the OECD’s Global Forum on Taxation had "failed
to do so".
In January 2008, meanwhile, it was reported that Cyprus had been placed by
the Russian government on a blacklist of uncooperative territories designed
to deter Russian companies from setting up offshore and repatriating income
back to Russia tax free.
According to the Cypriot media, the blacklist was part of an amendment to the
Russian tax code which came into effect on January 1, introducing a tax exemption
on the repatriation of dividends from foreign subsidiaries of Russian companies
under certain circumstances. Subsidiaries based in territories and countries
on the so-called blacklist were not included in the exemption.
Initially, this blacklist was said to contain 59 jurisdictions, and included
offshore territories such as the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands,
which, according to Russia, had shown reluctance in agreeing to information
exchange agreements with Moscow. The list also contained some European Union
countries, but it has since shrunk to about 40 countries after many governments
reportedly lobbied the Russian authorities to be excluded from the blacklist,
including, among others, Ireland, Luxembourg and Switzerland.
Cyprus however, remained on the list, and given the fact that the Mediterranean
island is one of the largest sources of investment into Russia, thanks in large
part to a favourable bilateral tax treaty and Cyprus's own attractive tax regime,
this caused concern.
In April, 2009, however, Russia and Cyprus have signed a new double taxation
avoidance agreement which should finally secure Cyprus's removal from the notorious
Russian 'blacklist'.
The protocol, the result of several years of hard bargaining, was signed in
Nicosia by Finance Minister Charilaos Stavrakis and Ilya Trunin, a senior tax
official in the Russian Finance Ministry.
Many European countries such as Ireland, Luxembourg and Switzerland successfully
lobbied the Russian government to be removed from the blacklist, but Cyprus
remained on the list due to its apparent failure in the past to fulfil requests
for information from the Russian tax authorities in certain cases. According
to Stavrakis, Cyprus's name will be erased from the blacklist once the new protocol
is fully ratified by both parties, thanks in large part to a commitment by Nicosia
last year to improve exchange of information provisions.
Stavrakis said that the new agreement maintains "the very low and competitive
factors Russians are enjoying today concerning investments through Cyprus"
although he conceded that Russia succeeded in winning "a significant number
of concessions" that they had been asking for.
A major concession won by Russia will see capital gains made by Russian subsidiaries
of Cypriot holding companies with more than 50% of their assets in Russian property
taxed at the prevailing rates in Russia.
Trunin remarked that the amendments ensure that the double tax agreement will
not be used "in an inappropriate way" by residents and investors in
Cyprus and Russia, but would nevertheless result in Cyprus's removal from Russia's
"list of offshore jurisdictions" which he stopped short of calling
a "blacklist."
BACK TO TOP